Consortium of Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs
  • About
    • Membership
    • Board of Directors
    • Bylaws
    • FAQs
    • Contact
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Programs
    • Syllabi
    • Teaching Resources
    • Advising Resources
    • Undergraduate Research Prizes and Publishing Resources
    • Organizations & Research Institutes
  • Jobs
  • Awards
    • 2024 Call For Award Nominations
    • 2023 Awards Recipients
    • 2022 Awards Recipients
    • 2021 Awards Recipients
    • 2020 Awards Recipients
    • 2019 Awards Recipients
    • 2017 Awards Recipients
    • 2016 Award Recipients
  • Meetings
    • 2023 Pre-Conference Workshop
    • Pre-Conference Workshop RSVP
    • CULJP Meetings
  • Newsletter
  • Virtual
    • 2020 CULJP-Sponsored Law &Society Association Virtual Meeting

Renee Dinsmore - Transitioning from Undergraduate Work to Graduate School

1/25/2016

1 Comment

 
 Renee Dinsmore is a doctoral student and Chancellor’s Fellow at the University of Kansas School of Public Affairs & Administration.
​

​This past spring I received my admission letter to my first-choice grad school. I cried, I called my mom, and I celebrated that I was going to get a PhD. Given the timeline, I knew I was going to graduate school before I finished my undergraduate degree. Technically, I did not know if I was capable of earning a college degree. Quickly, I shifted from celebratory, “I’m in!” to “What did I sign up for?” Was I ever going to sleep again? Can I cram enough exercise into summer to make up for sitting 12 hours/day for the next 5 years? Does mass caffeine consumption require training and conditioning? Amidst a wave of impostor syndrome panic, I asked graduate students, mentors, and professors for best practices. I learned that no advice is universal. The experience is unique to the person and context. Nonetheless, as I complete my first semester, I share four key elements I find integral to grad school so far.

The cohort relationship is unique and integral to surviving and thriving in grad school. Like family, you do not get to choose them, but you need them. They are your people during the good, the bad, and the ugly. In my case, I am in a cohort of two. I took a giant sigh of relief when I met him for the first time to learn he is not only normal, he is wonderful. We have spent hours together over the past couple months, and I cannot imagine the process without him. The relating, the venting, the bouncing of ideas, the self-care that happens at the bar, and the overall support we give each other is invaluable. That said, my cohort mate and I have very different goals in the program – likely a healthy trait of our relationship. I find it important to stay tuned to my goals and what success means to me. Frequently, I find myself calibrating back to “why I am here?”. The comparative can be dangerous, and avoiding it saves both my sanity and my relationship with my classmates.

In order to achieve these goals, I find structure and accountability invaluable. The reading load, the work assignment, and the course work are significant. Frankly, I flailed the first few weeks, and I write this as I am just finding my balanced routine. Using my long-term goals, I set short-term goals – for the month, the week, and the day. I have to adjust and remember to be kind to myself when I fall behind, but the structure of the short-term goals keeps me sane. Accountability reinforces my structure. I have joined two writing groups – one on Monday mornings (a great way to start a productive week) and one on Thursday afternoons (a great way to coast into the weekend.) The groups are very different. One is open for free writing. It doesn’t matter what you write; just write. The other is focused on a conference panel and paper a group of us are participating in next summer. Both are committed to holding each other accountable to stay focused and finish some work. They tend to be my most productive hours of the week. I highly recommend joining writing groups.

Finally, state of mind is important is grad school. Yes, it is difficult, but more importantly, it is manageable. And what everyone forgot to tell me (or I just didn’t listen) in my informal polling of how to survive grad school is that it is fun. I spent so much time fretting about workload, schedule, and my competency that I left my celebratory “I’m in!” moment fade too quickly. I get to wake up every day and read, write, and think about what I find meaningful in the world. I am immersed in scholarly work that impassions me. I am training to create knowledge. I am learning how to write a book some day! Spending six months collecting opinions about the challenges and hardships of graduate school kept me from realizing that moving from undergrad to grad school is rewarding. I have made a lifelong friend in my cohort-mate, I’m moving forward toward my goals, I’ve learned new routines that challenge me to be better, and I’m doing it while actively appreciating that this life makes me happy.
1 Comment

Clare Keefe Coleman - "Teaching the Torture Memos: 'Making Decisions under Conditions of Uncertainty'" (2012)

1/18/2016

0 Comments

 
Clare Keefe Coleman, Drexel University Earle Mack School of Law, published "Teaching the Torture Memos: 'Making Decision Under Conditions of Uncertainty'" in the Journal of Legal Education (62 J. Legal Educ. 81 (2012)); it may be of interest to anyone looking to teach these sources in an undergraduate course.
0 Comments

Renee Cramer - A Continuum of Identities and Experiences

1/5/2016

1 Comment

 
Renee Cramer is associate professor and chair of Law, Politics, and Society at Drake University; she is also President of the Consortium of Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs.

As I noted last month, students who hold marginalized social identities may find the social justice teaching tool, “The Line,” to be alienating and isolating.  But the impulse behind the activity is good – and it is important that we help our students see and understand privilege – whether or not they hold it.  I was fortunate to participate in a version of this exercise, which I will call a “Continuum of Identities and Experiences,” and brought the exercise back to two of my classrooms.   In all three of my experiences with it – as a participant, and as a facilitator – I found it to be incredibly powerful.
 
I have taught this exercise as part of my Critical Race and Feminist Theory course, and I alert students the week before the exercise that we will be exploring privilege, power, and personal experiences on a particular class session.  I do the exercise after at least six weeks of course work, and in the context of a caring and compassionate community of learners.   It is also done in the context of a class, and a set of relationships, where students have ready access to information they might need, in order to support their emotional engagement with the material (phone numbers for campus counseling, peer mentors, rape crisis lines, AA and NA meetings, etc.).
 
We began by reading a poem, “Please Call Me By My True Names,” by Buddhist monk and poet Thich Nhat Hahn.    Each of us read a line or two, then passed to another.  After the poem, we sat in silence for just a few moments – then I reminded students that our class conversations are confidential, and asked students to come and join me at the center of the room.    I told them that at any time that they don’t want to place themselves on the continuum, they can come back to the center, and that I will join them there.
 
I then explained: “We will be arranging ourselves on a continuum of experience – lets start with an easy one: Will the oldest person in the room, go stand at the chalkboard end of the room, and the youngest stand at the far wall?  Everyone else, just arrange yourself in order, along the continuum.”  I then walk to the chalkboard end of the room – in my forties, I’m usually (but not always) the oldest.  I also tell students that they are free to talk during this exercise if they want to arrange themselves according to month of birth within a given year, for instance.
 
What tends to happen, right away, is that a whole clump of students who are 19 and 20 stand near the far wall, and I am lonely near the chalk board.  I say that anyone who wants to talk about where they are on the continuum is welcome to – perhaps there is a returning/non-traditional student in the room, who offers a few words about what it is like to be ten years older than most of the students – or a 17 year old who has brought so many credits from high school that she has junior standing already.  Someone almost always mentions how they never noticed that they were all the same age … it was something they took for granted until the exercise pointed it out.  Anyone who wants to briefly speak, can. 

I then ask them a series of questions that will enable them to place themselves on a continuum of experience, and offer the same opportunity to reflect.  The questions can be done in any order, can be omitted or tailored to suit your group, and ask students to place themselves on a continuum of –
  • How literate were your grandparents (Very to Not at all)?
  • Where were you in terms of birth order in your family (oldest to youngest)?
  • How much money did you have, growing up (lots and lots to none at all)?
  • How far from your home did you travel to be at this university?
  • How comfortable do you feel at this university, in terms of your social identities?
  • How conventional is your sex life?
  • How much violence have you experienced in your life?
  • How many animals did you have as pets growing up?
  • How close are you to “white” in terms of your racial identity?
  • How many ethnicities contribute to your identity?
  • How many hours a week do you work, for pay, while going to school?
  • How many dependents do you have responsibility for, while going to school?
  • How far from the United States were  you born?
  • How many languages were spoken in your home?
  • How often are you the only person of your own race, in a given situation (work, school, church)?
  • How close to bullying have you been (as a bully, or as someone who has been bullied)?
  • How closely do you identify with conventional gender norms?

You can see that some of these questions will elicit stronger responses than others  - but you may be surprised at which ones bring up the most for your students.  When I did the activity, the “birth order” question hit me really hard: I am an only child of my mom and dad, the middle child of 6 step-siblings in two different families, and the oldest of the diad of my younger step-sister and me, in the home I grew up in.  I couldn’t figure out where to stand – so I sat in the middle.  I cried.  I was happy to be joined by the wonderful Rhonda Magee, who was also a participant in the workshop.
 
When I took students through the exercise, they had a lot of fun with sexual identity questions, and we found the responses to “how often are you the only person of your own race…” interesting.  Certainly, the African American students in the room had this feeling often; they were surprised to hear from one or two white students who attended majority-minority high schools, who spent much of their younger years feeling isolated.   The question about family finances also hit home for many students, in ways that disrupted racial stereotypes as well as geographic stereotypes – our rural students come from small towns, but might be well-off farm kids, for instance.
 
The question about proximity to violence was, honestly, horrible.  On the one hand, it was beautiful to see so many students recognize in each other the common bond they shared at having been subject to intimate partner violence, parental violence, gun violence … on the other, it was disheartening and, frankly, terrifying, to have at least half of the room identify themselves as having been “very close” to violence in their short lives. 
 
We spent an hour with the exercise (not doing every question, certainly!), and I ended with the one about pets as a way to help students wrap up their feelings and have a lighter conversation.  We then just sat for a few minutes in a circle, and I thanked them for their good will and participation.  I reminded them that we weren’t sharing what we heard outside of this room, I invited them to use the resources we have on campus and in our city if the exercise had brought up any difficult-to-process emotions, and I asked them to reflect on what the exercise showed them about privilege.  I then gave them two to three minutes to write their responses to that last prompt down, and we used those notes during the next class period, as well as specific readings on privilege and being an ally, to jumpstart our conversation.
 
In all, students responded extremely well to the exercise – though I have to stress that several of them had intense emotional reactions that required care during facilitation and in our subsequent relationship.   I believe that we need to educate “the whole student,” and that helping students see where they hold privilege, where they have trauma in common with others, where they might find solidarity, and where they might be allies and advocates is an important task  - not only of emancipatory education in general, but of interdisciplinary legal studies, in particular. ​
1 Comment

    In the Classroom:
    A Blog about Undergrad Teaching and Learning

    A group blog of the Consortium for Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs. Follow us on Twitter or Facebook for alerts about new posts.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    March 2022
    January 2022
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    July 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    April 2018
    May 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Categories

    All
    Assignments
    Call For Papers
    Classroom Activities
    Conferences
    Constitutional Law
    Criminal Justice
    Graduate School
    Mentoring
    Prelaw Advising
    Primary Sources
    Social Justice
    Syllabi
    Teaching
    Television
    Undergraduate Curriculum And Program Design
    Undergraduate Research

Proudly powered by Weebly