Consortium of Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs
  • Home/About
    • FAQs
    • Contact
    • Board of Directors
    • Bylaws
  • Membership
  • Announcements
    • Fellowships
    • Job Postings
    • Calls for Papers
    • Newsletter
  • Programs
  • Resources
    • Syllabi
    • Teaching Resources
    • Advising Resources
    • Undergraduate Research Prizes and Publishing Resources
    • Organizations & Research Institutes
  • Awards
    • 2022 Awards Recipients
    • 2021 Awards Recipients
    • 2020 Awards Recipients
    • 2019 Awards Recipients
    • 2017 Awards Recipients
    • 2016 Award Recipients
  • Meetings
    • Pre-Conference Workshop RSVP
    • CULJP-sponsored Conference Panels
    • CULJP Meetings
  • Blog

Jamie Longazel - ​The Unlikely, Ambiguous Feminism of Legally Blonde

4/17/2017

2 Comments

 
Jamie Longazel is Assistant Professor of Sociology and Research Fellow at the Human Rights Center at the University of Dayton. 

I teach a unit on legal education in my Law & Society course. Among other lessons, I use it as an opportunity to introduce students to feminist legal theory.

We read a chapter from Becoming Gentlemen by Lani Guinier, Michelle Fine, and Jane Balin, a chapter from What Works for Women at Work by Joan Williams and Rachel Dempsey, and a provocative essay about sexism and public bathrooms.

Students always told me the unit reminds them of the 2001 film Legally Blonde starring Reese Witherspoon, and insisted that I show it in class.

Over and again, I dismissed their pleas, even without having seen the film. How could it not be problematic?
In time, I gave in. I promised I would at least watch the movie. And if it turned out to be appropriate, I would consider showing it the following year.

The first thirty minutes or so confirmed my suspicions: It was pure garbage, nothing but stereotypes.
Just when I was about to give up on it, however, there was a shift. I stood corrected. It may suffer from inaccuracies, but we could definitely use it to start a conversation about feminist legal theory.

To my students’ delight, I have shown the film in class each of the last two years. I use it to set up an in-class debate around the question, “Is Legally Blonde a feminist film?”

I’m not about to launch into a full analysis here; after all, I wouldn’t want my future students to stumble upon this post and use it to give their side an advantage in the debate. Instead, let me simply note a few highlights from this year’s debate.

Those who argued ‘yes, Legally Blonde is a feminist film’ said…
  • The film challenges the idea that feminism is ‘anti-feminine.’ All women are included – even Reese Witherspoon’s character, Elle Woods, who studies fashion and wears exuberant amounts of pink. Feminism is about being yourself.
  • The film depicts women, as our student judge so wonderfully summarized, “unlearning the patriarchy.” For example, while Elle’s ex-boyfriend Warner pitted Elle and his new girlfriend, Vivian, against one another, in time the two became friends after realizing their shared interests as women.   
  • Rather than being saved by a man, Elle’s female law professor picks Elle up when she is down after bumping into her at the salon.
Those who argued ‘no, Legally Blonde is not a feminist film’ said…
  • This is upper class, white feminism. Women from backgrounds different from Elle’s would not be able to pull off what she did.
  • The ‘be who you are’ message aside, stereotypes remained rampant – especially, for example, among Elle’s sorority sisters, who received almost no character development. 
  • Over and again, the objectification of Elle is what placed her in the prominent positions that led to her success, sending a subtle message that she is not competent otherwise.
As you can see, students on both sides come up with some solid arguments. What I like most about the exercise is that the ambiguity makes for a good debate. I also appreciate how my law school-bound students relish the opportunity to make a case in front of a crowd, particularly the women, who, not surprisingly, tend to be much more engaged in this activity.

This year, the “yes team” won the debate. Although next year, it just may go the other way.  
2 Comments
Filipino Quebec link
3/3/2021 03:42:02 pm

Hi great readingg your post

Reply
Eliza Eats link
3/19/2021 04:11:09 am

Great post thaank you

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    In the Classroom:
    A Blog about Undergrad Teaching and Learning

    A group blog of the Consortium for Undergraduate Law and Justice Programs. Follow us on Twitter or Facebook for alerts about new posts.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    March 2022
    January 2022
    June 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    July 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    October 2019
    September 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    April 2018
    May 2017
    April 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    August 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015

    Categories

    All
    Assignments
    Call For Papers
    Classroom Activities
    Conferences
    Constitutional Law
    Criminal Justice
    Graduate School
    Mentoring
    Prelaw Advising
    Primary Sources
    Social Justice
    Syllabi
    Teaching
    Television
    Undergraduate Curriculum And Program Design
    Undergraduate Research

Proudly powered by Weebly